The ideal scientist thinks like a poet and works like a bookkeeper.
We should preserve every scrap of biodiversity as priceless while we learn to use it and come to understand what it means to humanity.
We ought to recognize that religious strife is not the consequence of differences among people. It’s about conflicts between creation stories.
Ants are the leading removers of dead creatures on the land. And the rest of life is substantially dependent upon them.
I tend to believe that religious dogma is a consequence of evolution.
Even as empiricism is winning the mind, transcendentalism continues to win the heart.
Companies that are willing to share, to withhold in order to further the growth of the company, willing to try to get a better atmosphere through a demonstration of democratic principles, fairness and cooperation, a better product, those will win in the end.
Competing is intense among humans, and within a group, selfish individuals always win. But in contests between groups, groups of altruists always beat groups of selfish individuals.
One planet, one experiment.
Blind faith, no matter how passionately expressed, will not suffice. Science for its part will test relentlessly every assumption about the human condition.
If those committed to the quest fail, they will be forgiven. When lost, they will find another way. The moral imperative of humanism is the endeavor alone, whether successful or not, provided the effort is honorable and failure memorable.
The biological evolutionary perception of life and of human qualities is radically different from that of traditional religion, whether it’s Southern Baptist or Islam or any religion that believes in a supernatural supervalance over humanity.
We are not afraid of predators, we’re transfixed by them, prone to weave stories and fables and chatter endlessly about them, because fascination creates preparedness, and preparedness, survival. In a deeply tribal way, we love our monsters...
By any reasonable measure of achievement, the faith of the Enlightenment thinkers in science was justified.
People would rather believe than know.
The one process now going on that will take millions of years to correct is the loss of genetic and species diversity by the destruction of natural habitats. This is the folly our descendants are least likely to forgive us.
It’s always been a dream of mine, of exploring the living world, of classifying all the species and finding out what makes up the biosphere.
Homo sapiens, the first truly free species, is about to decommission natural selection, the force that made us. Soon we must look deep within ourselves and decide what we wish to become.
There can be no purpose more enspiriting than to begin the age of restoration, reweaving the wondrous diversity of life that still surrounds us.
There doesn’t seem to be any other way of creating the next green revolution without GMOs.