You will not pit one word of God against another word of God.
Hinduism dies if untouchability lives, and untouchability has to die if Hinduism is to live.
Hinduism does not rest on the authority of one book or one prophet, nor does it posses a common creed like the Kalma.
Hinduism has absorbed the best of all the faiths of the world and in that sense Hinduism is not an exclusive religion.
Hinduism has become a conservative religion and, therefore, a mighty force because of the swadeshi spirit underlying it.
Hinduism has sinned in giving sanction to untouchability.
Hinduism is not a codified religion.
Hinduism loses its right to make a universal appeal if it closes its temples to Harijans.
Hinduism with its message of ahimsa is to me the most glorious religion in the world.
Hinduism would not have been much of a religion if Rama had not steeled his heart against every temptation.
Buddha never rejected Hinduism, but he broadened its base. He gave it a new life and a new interpretation.
If God gives me the privilege of dying for the Hinduism of my conception, I shall have sufficiently died for the unity of all and even for Swaraj.
If I know Hinduism at all, it is essentially inclusive and ever-growing, ever-responsive. It gives the freest scope for imagination, speculation and reason.
I have nothing of the communalist in me because my Hinduism is all inclusive.
I know that Buddhism is to Hinduism what Protestantism is to Roman Catholicism, only in a much stronger light, to a much greater degree.
I must rebel against the idea that millions of Indians, who were Hindus, the other day, changed their nationality on adopting Islam as their religion.
I would far rather that Hinduism died than that untouchability lived.
My Hindu instinct tells me that all religions are more or less true.
My Hinduism must be a very poor thing if it cannot flourish even under the most adverse influence.
My life is dedicated to the service of Indians through the religion of nonviolence which I believe to be the root of Hinduism.