The president already has a Nobel Prize for peace. I think he’s shooting for one in fiction.
If a president can change some laws, can he change ALL laws? Can he change election laws? Can he change discrimination laws? Are there any laws, under your theory, that he actually HAS to enforce?
While people are free to draw different conclusions from the facts, there should be no debate over whether the American public is entitled to have all of the facts.
If you can turn off certain categories of law, do you not also have the power to turn off all categories of law?
These last few years we’ve seen an unacceptable abuse of power, having a president whose priority is expanding his own power.
No law can give Congress a backbone if it refuses to stand off as the coequal branch the Constitution made it.
There’s no way we can get to the bottom of Benghazi without David Petraeus.
Members of Congress are incredibly blessed and fortune to have the jobs that we have. Nobody makes us run. Every two years we offer for public office, and if you don’t want to do it then don’t run. But the notion that you can make $174,000 in this country and be underpaid is laughable.
I’m going to help the committee regardless of any position I have. I will volunteer to be a summer intern.
The notion that the First Amendment has no limitations whatsoever is balderdash.
My daughter took Latin for three years; she still cant speak it.